JOHN BOLTON’S LIBYA SOLUTION — ASSASSINATE GADHAFI
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:19am by Emily Esfahani Smith
This is my comment to this article:
John Bolton is part of the problem. Libya is none of our business. They have a leader, and if they want him removed that is up to them. Their problem is not our problem unless they become a problem for the security of this nation, and the American people. There is not a dimes worth of difference between the republicans and the democrats. They both seem to suffer from "swollen" Ego. If John Bolton, Obama, and, or, Hillary Clinton want to pursue a military "adventure" in Libya, let them lead, and I don't mean lead from some, safe, desk in the US, but lead by being on the front lines, and putting their life where they put their loud mouth. These "adventures" are just "playing to the "lower base" of our society, while taking focus off the real issue of getting this economy back on track, and repealing the already destructive socialist programs that "bloat" this nation and its taxpayers. This is why we need a third political party that can bring logic to this socialist government and help to remove this socialist President.
Divide and Conquer. This most successful strategy continues, and is the most positive reason that this country is so divided. Unless extreme measures are taken, immediately, this great country will fall as did Rome. We are dominated by two major political parties, Republican and Democrat. On "paper" they represent two distinct, right and left, ideals of the interpretation of the Constitution, and the means and ideals of society, based on a "point of view", as seen by the leaders of these two parties. We had 4 years of Bush One, 8 years of Clinton, 8 years of Bush Two, and 2 years of Obama (so far), and what actual difference was there between these Republican and Democrat leaders? Zero. The actions of these leaders never came close to their "words". I will not bother to give examples of proof for this statement for if you don't understand it now, you will never understand it, and you will continue to further enslave yourself and your children. But for those of you who can "see the forest for the trees," I ask you to think about a third major political party. As this country was founded on Christian values, I propose that this new party be called Christian Democrats. It would be composed of persons that understand that we need to follow the Constitution as it was written, and persons that demand that the words of politicians equal the actions of these same elected politicians. The reason that the Republican party opposes a third party is that it would take, almost exclusively, persons that are registered as Republican from their roster. So Be It. There is not a dimes worth of difference between the actual actions of the Republican and Democratic parties today. This new party would be a force that could make or break every election, and keep the values of equality and freedom, contained in the Constitution as our guide.
Lord Howard Hurts